Quantum Physics
Gravity as Critical Entropic Back-Pressure
×
File 1
Main Paper
File 2
This paper clarifies the internal structure of the BCB–VERSF research programme. Multiple papers within the programme employ different formalisms—conservation laws, capacity constraints, measurement dynamics, and effective field descriptions. The purpose of this paper is to make those levels explicit, to state clearly which claims belong to which layer, and to articulate the meta-theoretic status of the foundational constraint.
File 3
This paper provides a clear, explanatory overview of how the main papers in the BCB–VERSF research programme relate to one another.
One Fold: Deriving Fundamental Physics from a Single Unit of Distinguishability
×
File 1
Main Paper
File 2
A companion audit that makes the assumptions, dependencies, and robustness of the One-Fold derivations explicit.
File 3
Paper III shows that the “five assumptions” behind the gauge-group result don’t compound independently—almost all the risk concentrates in GG3—and it replaces the old α gap correction with a UV–IR RG matching condition via a fold scale μ*.
File 4
This paper supplies the missing dynamical and informational backbone of the One-Fold programme, showing why the structures are generic, stable, and quantitatively consistent rather than merely admissible.
Deriving the Proton Mass: Why It Matters!
×
File 1
Establishes the BCB information-theoretic mass framework, deriving the bit scale and structural multiplicities that organize baryon masses, and reducing the proton mass problem to determining a single closure-depth invariant.
File 2
A companion paper that removes circularity by deriving the baryon closure depth N=17 N=17 from BCB+TPB constraint dynamics (mix–project contraction on a C₃-symmetric residual space), making the proton mass a derived consequence rather than an input.
Why the Universe Chose SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1)
×
File 1
Main Paper
File 2
General Reader Summary
File 3
This paper shows that the internal symmetries of the Standard Model are fixed by information-theoretic consistency rather than postulate.
File 4
This paper replaces every remaining assumption with either a proof or a minimal empirical anchor so that nothing load-bearing is left unexamined
Fixing Physics’ Worst Prediction
×
File 1
Phenomenology and predictions
File 2
Conceptual foundations
File 3
Mathematical rigor and verification
File 4
A technical companion that rigorously derives the microphysical inputs behind the Two-Planck framework’s dimensional-transmutation prediction of the coherence scale.
File 5
A critical epistemic analysis
File 6
This paper hardens Route M by turning the three remaining heuristics in Paper 4 (bare coupling, constraint independence, and percolation threshold) into controlled, testable results—without changing any assumptions or predictions from Papers 1–3.
The Fine-Structure Constant: When Quantum Channels Meet the Void
×
File 1
Paper I explains what α measures.
File 2
Paper II shows how its numerical value emerges from discrete structure.
File 3
Paper III shows why that structure is dynamically enforced rather than assumed.
File 4
Paper IV shows why electromagnetism is forced to be a surface problem—turning the fine-structure constant from a clever result into a necessity.
File 5
why the coupling’s normalization is fixed by interface matching.
File 6
Paper VI — why the one-bit structure itself is forced by reversible commitment
All research papers and documents are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Please credit the source when quoting or reusing.
Please credit the source when quoting or reusing.